Early detection of lung cancer can save lives
In fact, according to the American Cancer Society, in 2012, lung cancer caused more deaths than breast, prostate, pancreas and colon cancers combined.
So even though you'll probably never see professional athletes sporting pearl-colored gloves and shoes (pearl is the color of the lung cancer ribbon) to raise awareness, it's important to learn about the disease: who is at risk — not just people who smoke tobacco — how it's treated and why early detection is the best defense.
Here, Mary Jo Fidler, MD, a medical oncologist at Rush University Medical Center, discusses five things everyone should know about lung cancer.
It's often caused by a combination of factors.
"It's natural to associate lung cancer with cigarette smoking. Although it's true that smoking is responsible for close to 80 percent of all lung cancer cases, lung cancer among people who have never smoked is the sixth leading cause of cancer death worldwide," says Fidler.
Potential causes among nonsmokers include exposure to radon gas, asbestos, industrial chemicals and/or secondhand smoke (the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services says secondhand smoke increases a nonsmoker’s lung cancer risk by 20 to 30 percent). Air pollution likely contributes as well.
While any of these factors can cause lung cancer on their own, the disease is often the result of interacting factors.
For instance, according to the National Institutes of Health, there is a greater risk for lung cancer when smokers are also exposed to radon gas. And research studies have shown that the combination of smoking and asbestos exposure greatly increases a person’s risk of developing lung cancer vs. both nonsmoking asbestos workers and smokers who are not exposed to asbestos.
Occupational exposures — including asbestos, uranium and coke (a type of fuel used in smelters, blast furnaces and foundries) — can also increase a person's risk of dying from their lung cancer, according to another study.
Genes may play a role in lung cancer risk.
Scientists are now discovering that another culprit may be responsible for some nonsmokers getting lung cancer: genetics.
A study published in the journal Nature Genetics identified three genetic variations — two on chromosome 6 and one on chromosome 10 — that are associated with increased lung cancer risk in Asian women who have never smoked.
According to the study's authors, these findings show that the risk of lung cancer among people who never smoked, especially Asian women, may be associated with specific genetic characteristics that distinguish it from lung cancer in smokers.
Another study, published in Cancer, found that a variant in the NFKB1 gene was associated with a 21 to 44 percent reduced risk of lung cancer. Because a protein produced in part of the NFKB1 gene is known to play a significant role in inflammation and immunity by regulating gene expression, cell death and cell production, the study suggests that inflammation and immune response may be associated with lung cancer risk.
Further research is needed, however, to determine whether there's a cause and effect relationship between this variant in the NFKB1 gene and lung cancer. Future studies may also shed more light on the exact role inflammation plays in lung cancer risk.
If you're at high risk, CT scans are an effective screening tool.
As with other cancers, the key to surviving lung cancer is catching it in the earliest stages, when it's most treatable. The five-year survival rate for people whose cancers are diagnosed when they're still localized — meaning they haven't yet spread to the lymph node drainage system or other areas of the body — can be as high as 80 to 90 percent; the survival rate plummets to 2 percent if the diagnosis happens after the cancer has spread to other body parts.
Unfortunately, because symptoms (including persistent cough or coughing up blood, unexplained weight loss, persistent chest pain and shortness of breath) don't usually appear until the later stages, lung cancer is tough to diagnose early.
One promising screening method, low-dose spiral computed tomography (CT), has proven to reduce lung cancer deaths in patients at high risk for lung cancer. In fact, the National Lung Screening Trial found a 20 percent reduction in deaths from lung cancer among current or former heavy smokers who were screened with low-dose spiral CT (versus those screened by chest X-ray).
However, because the scans can also yield false positive results — by mistaking scar tissue or benign lumps for cancer — they're recommended only for people at high-risk, for whom the benefits of early detection outweigh the risks of potential false positives and repeated exposure from the scans.
Based on the study's findings, the American Lung Association recommends lung cancer screening with low-dose spiral CT for people who are 55 to 74 years of age who have smoked for 30 pack years (an average of one pack a day for 30 years) or more, are either still smoking or have quit within the past 15 years, and don’t have any lung cancer symptoms.
"Talk to your doctor if you're in this high-risk group," says Fidler. "The best evidence we have available tells us that while CT scanning isn't right for everyone, for those at high risk it does prevent lung cancer deaths by enabling earlier diagnoses."
Some tumors can be removed minimally invasively.
Tumors that are caught in the early stages can often be surgically removed, giving patients a good chance of being cancer-free. The standard procedure to remove the lobe of the lung in which the tumor is located, known as a lobectomy, typically requires a six-inch incision in the chest through which the ribsare spread apart.
But at a handful of medical centers, including Rush, roughly 80 percent of lobectomies can be done using a minimally invasive approach.
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomies are performed through small incisions (and without spreading the rib cage) using a tiny video camera and specialized surgical instruments. There are many benefits to a VATS lobectomy vs. open surgery — including less pain and fewer complications after surgery, less time in the hospital and a speedier recovery — and the results are comparable, making it a good option for many tumors.
Newer treatments pack a targeted punch.
Research has yielded a wealth of information about how lung cancer cells change and grow, enabling scientists to develop drugs to specifically address those changes.
These "targeted" drug therapies, used alone or in combination with chemotherapy, are typically less toxic and have fewer side effects than chemotherapy because they zero in on specific genes or proteins more often found in cancer cells then in healthy tissue.
- The monoclonal antibody bevacizumab, a man-made version of a specific immune system protein, prevents the tumor from developing new blood vessels to feed it (tumors can’t grow without a blood supply). Bevacizumab specifically targets vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a protein essential to the formation of new blood vessels.
- Erlotinib targets epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR), proteins found on the surface of cells that helps cells to grow and divide. Erlotinib blocks EGFR from signaling the cells to grow, which can help keep some lung tumors under control.
- Crizotinib targets the ALK gene. A rearrangement of the ALK gene, found in about 5 percent of non-small cell lung cancers, creates an abnormal protein that makes the cancer cells grow and spread. Blocking the abnormal ALK protein has been shown to help shrink tumors, although it hasn't yet been proven to help patients live longer.
"Targeted therapies are used primarily for late stage or metastatic disease to help slow the cancer's growth and prolong survival," Fidler says. "Building on the promise of these approaches, we're continuing to look for new molecular avenues to attack lung cancer tumors."